Nikoopayan Tak, M S; Bhattacharya, A; Metcalf, A R and Mousavi, E (2023) Cleanroom air quality: Combined effects of ventilation rate and filtration schemes in a laboratory cleanroom. Building Research & Information, 51(6), pp. 717-729. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Ventilation performance and air quality in cleanrooms are affected by several interconnected parameters, and a change in one component can impact the entire system. Furthermore, occupant interactions with the physical environment can influence particle dispersion, disrupt current airflow by introducing new wakes and ultimately decrease ventilation efficacy. As a result, we set up an experimental study to measure the effects of traffic, flowrate and filtration on ventilation performance while a source of contamination was inside the room. Experiments included three types of occupant movements (i.e., NM, WO, WT) and were performed under two different airflow conditions. Three different metrics, namely relative ventilation efficiency ((Formula presented.)), decay rate (R) and exposure (γ), were introduced to statistically compare changes in ventilation performance in response to different experimental setups. Decay rates obtained for 0.3-micron particles decreased by up to 50% in the presence of occupants. Lowering cleanroom flowrate due to additional filtering can reduced ventilation effectiveness by almost 50%. Care should be exercised when changing filter efficiency because it can reduce the rate of air supply. These findings are especially intriguing in the context of cleanroom retrofit, as reducing air exchange rates was an unintended consequence of improving filter efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | air movement; air quality; airborne infection; building engineering |
| Index terms: | exposure, building engineering, experiment, ventilation, movement, unintended consequence, laboratory, air movement, interaction, effectiveness, presence, air quality, contamination, efficiency |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, performance management, environmental health, behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, research management, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, risk assessment, air quality, mechanical systems, environmental science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here