Pan, W; Yang, Y and Pan, M (2023) Implementing modular integrated construction in high-rise high-density cities: Perspectives in Hong Kong. Building Research & Information, 51(3), pp. 354-368. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Modular construction has been widely promoted with numerous benefits, but the promotion has largely been for low- to medium-rise buildings. The implementation of high-rise modular buildings in high-density cities remains limited. This paper aims to investigate modular adoption in high-rise high-density cities by examining drivers, constraints and strategies with the case of modular integrated construction in Hong Kong. The research was carried out through a literature review, expert interviews and a questionnaire survey with key stakeholders. The most important drivers were identified to be faster construction and shortened project duration, financial incentives, better quality control, policy initiative and promotion and improved workers' well-being. The most significant constraints were found to be over-stringent regulations, limited codes and standards, limited capable suppliers and contractors, logistics challenges and loss of saleable areas. The most important success strategies were identified relating to financial incentives, standards and codes, technical solutions, transport regulations and prioritized adoption in public housing. A systems framework is proposed to address the complexity of modular adoption within social, technological, economic, supply chain and regulatory contexts. The findings should help accelerate the adoption of modular methods in high-rise high-density cities and contribute a systematic approach to informing future research into modular construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | high-rise construction; modular construction; modular integrated construction; off-site construction; socio-technical system |
| Index terms: | public housing, duration, quality control, implementation, off-site construction, Hong Kong, density, systems framework, modular building, promotion, modular construction, well-being, socio-technical system, regulation, questionnaire, complexity, financial incentive, interview, high-rise construction, literature review, strategy, survey |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, analytical methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, mental health and wellbeing, construction type, data collection methods, building construction, project controls, systems engineering, political science, theoretical framing, management, Geography |
| Topics: | Governance, Procurement, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Time Control, Quality Management, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here