Assessing the sustainability of architectural reclamation processes: An evaluation procedure for the early design phase

Zatta, E and Condotta, M (2023) Assessing the sustainability of architectural reclamation processes: An evaluation procedure for the early design phase. Building Research & Information, 51(1), pp. 21-38. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Managing the outdated building stock through more efficient circular processes such as reuse appears to be a sustainable strategy to undertake in limiting the environmental impacts of the building sector. Nevertheless, neither the ties between sustainability and circularity are clear, nor the convenience of architectural reuse processes in environmental and economic terms. The study developed a decision-making tool, a fast self-assessment procedure supporting designers in understanding the convenience in using reclaimed building elements from the project concept. Using desk study and case study methods, and adopting a comprehensive sustainability perspective, the investigation focused on the parameters to use and on the characteristics of the evaluation. Five parameters were identified for the environmental, economic and social assessment. Two scenarios were then compared, the workflows and the boundaries for the evaluation defined, and the direct and indirect impacts on the overall processes evaluated. The results of the case study allowed validating the procedure developed, in both its ease of performing and the comprehensive sustainability perspective. Although the research would benefit from further field testing, it provides an alternative tool for evaluating the circular outcomes in the architectural field, and to develop the sustainability of the built environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; circular economy; evaluation procedure; reclamation; reuse processes; sustainability
Index terms: built environment, design phase, field testing, investigation, case study, circularity, circular economy, designer, decision-making, reclamation, environmental impact, workflow, boundaries, building stock, strategy
Subjects: property law, professional practice, profession, data collection methods, sustainable materials, environmental impact, asset management, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, management, sustainable design, land management
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here