Zhang, Z; Fang, K; Zhang, S; Zhang, W; Wang, X and Furuya, N (2023) Physical environmental factors that affect users' willingness to visit neighbourhood centres in China. Building Research & Information, 51(5), pp. 568-587. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The physical environment is crucial for creating an attractive and sustainable neighbourhood centre. Previous research has explored various aspects of the physical environments of community public spaces; however, few studies have focused on neighbourhood centres in China or elucidated how to prioritize those factors to affect willingness to visit. A questionnaire survey was used to capture which potential physical environmental factors most affect residents' perceived willingness to visit a neighbourhood centre. Three hundred fifty-six valid survey answers were collected online from residents of Zhejiang Province, China. The results highlight key physical environmental factors and their relative priorities; safety factors are the most valued by residents, whereas green spaces, number and quietness (which have been discussed in previous studies) are considered generally unimportant. The key factors were classified into three groups: spatial quality, accessibility and spatial capacity. The results presented herein provide new insights from residents about neighbourhood centres. The research developed a comprehensive framework for assessing the physical environment of a neighbourhood centre based on key factor prioritization and grouping characteristics that can guide designers and decision makers in assessing and enhancing neighbourhood centres in communities with limited resources.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | neighbourhood centre; physical environment; user perspective; willingness to visit |
| Index terms: | user perspective, survey, China, environmental factor, safety factor, public space, questionnaire, designer, accessibility |
| Subjects: | financial risk, Geography, urban design and public space, inclusive design, environmental science, user focus, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here