Alexandrou, K; Thravalou, S and Artopoulos, G (2024) Heritage-BIM for energy simulation: A data exchange method for improved interoperability. Building Research & Information, 52(3), pp. 373-386. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for Building Energy Simulation (BES) is challenged by inadequate data integration and unreliable data and geometry conversion. Despite recent efforts to address critical interoperability issues, the effective exchange of data between the two digital environments remains a non-truly fulfilled promise of the digital transformation agenda for the industry. To contribute to the broader community effort in mitigating this deficiency, the present article proposes an alternative method for securing an improved BIM to BES workflow for existing and heritage buildings. The proposed method suggests an alternative way for integrating environmental analysis data to the Heritage BIM model, as well as an easy to develop visual programming process for missing data recovery, through auxiliary exchange operations. The article also presents lessons learned for the geometrical conversion of BIM elements with non-standard and irregular attributes, evaluated through the energy retrofit application of a colonial heritage building. The proposed method demonstrates how visual programming tools and common data exchange formats can supplementary assist existing practises to deal with major interoperability obstacles. The overall findings contribute to current efforts in the field, for the establishment of good practices of using Heritage BIM for energy retrofit architectural interventions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building energy simulation; energy retrofit; green building extensible markup language; heritage building information modelling; interoperability |
| Index terms: | geometry, building information modelling, data exchange, conversion, environmental analysis, recovery, good practice, information modelling, transformation, building energy simulation, interoperability, energy simulation, heritage building, programming, green building, integration, workflow, lessons learned |
| Subjects: | programming, environmental impact, construction type, business, mathematical modelling, energy systems, modelling and simulation, operations management, digital design, professional development, performance measurement, design practice, management, manufacturing engineering, data exchange, information systems, systems and processes, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here