Anspach, J A; Sharma, V and Madathil, K C (2024) Hospital design planning: unscheduled trauma ER visits impacting inpatient space allocation. Building Research & Information, 52(7), pp. 836-850. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Medical healthcare planners need to align outpatient and inpatient design factors that affect hospital space allocation. The Emergency Departments (ED) design must be congruent with the inpatient platform design to limit bottlenecking of patient admissions. However, limited research deciphers the impact of unscheduled ED admissions and the effects on inpatient bed capacity to ensure facility capability. The current study utilizes a case study by comparing the use of space planning criteria of the Department of Defense (DoD) with similar Private healthcare organization departmental metrics to inform space allocation. This study established the significance of unscheduled ED visits metric on inpatient space allocation. Bed capacity was calculated by outlining specific metrics; namely: population at risk, Average Daily Patient Load (ADPL), Average Length of Stay (ALOS), Average Annual Workload, Annual Admissions, and Occupancy Rate that are necessary for the right-sized inpatient hospital designs with a trauma mission. By analyzing existing research, identifying key metrics, highlighting capacity gaps, and showcasing real-world impacts via a case study pilot model. Valuable insights and benefits allow medical planners and administrators to assess and incorporate unscheduled visits as a key factor that influences appropriate hospital facility sizing and resource allocation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | emergency room; inpatient; outpatient; programming; space planning |
| Index terms: | capacity gap, workload, design factor, population, space planning, occupancy rate, programming, space allocation, resource allocation, platform, case study, hospital facility, planner |
| Subjects: | design practice, management, design process, digital design, asset management, demography, data collection methods, profession, construction type, programming, resource management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Human Resources, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here