Boissonneault, A and Peters, T (2024) An exploration of post-occupancy evaluation in Canada: Origins, milestones and next steps. Building Research & Information, 52(3), pp. 332-357. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Several histories by prominent researchers in the field locate Canada among the early adopters and entrepreneurs of post-occupancy evaluation ('POE'). Despite its reputation for being in use in Canada, POE has lived comfortably on the margins of the Canadian building industry for decades, taking a backseat to more prescriptive and prognostic approaches to building performance and design quality. This paper provides a semi-systematic review and content analysis of POE as it appears today in Canadian research, policy, practice and education. Results are presented in two parts. The first part details the untold history of POE in Canada, its origins and milestone contributions, and current directions. The second part summarizes results from the literature search and discusses relevant findings. Findings show siloed efforts in POE continue to be the primary barrier to the mainstreaming of POE in Canada. Canada is, however, making headway in post-occupancy verification programmes and these programmes have the potential to pave the way for POE as an industry best-practice. The paper concludes with several recommendations to advance POE efforts, including establishing pan-Canadian performance indicators, building bridges between sectors and continuing to normalize data collection and sharing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; building performance evaluation; buildings in use; Canada; Post-occupancy evaluation |
| Index terms: | mainstreaming, content analysis, systematic literature review, building industry, performance indicator, building performance evaluation, design quality, building performance, history, post-occupancy evaluation, Canada, exploration, programme |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, project controls, business, architectural and construction history, environmental resource management, industry analysis, performance management, research evaluation and metrics, Geography, building performance, evaluation methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Sustainability, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here