The role of design management in the sustainable building process

Rekola, M; Mäkeläinen, T and Häkkinen, T (2012) The role of design management in the sustainable building process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(2), pp. 78-89. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Sustainable building (SB) aims at the required building performance with minimum adverse environmental impact, while encouraging improvements in economic, social and cultural circumstances. The role of design is essential in interpreting and solving these complicated multilevel requirements. This article analyses current design management practices in Finnish construction projects. The aim was to define the challenges that SB brings to the role of the chief designer (stated in the Finnish building code) and to understand how a chief designer contributes towards SB. Study found that the role is defined and practiced mostly as a technical supervisor. The general shared definition of a more fundamental meaning of the role is shallow. The means and mechanisms of performing the task, however, rely on social interaction, influencing and leadership. A lot more power and effect could be got out of design management if these would be consciously involved. SB does not necessarily create more tasks but it affects several existing tasks by bringing new substance to be considered in the design decisions. The key impact that the chief designer can make is created through successful leadership of human creative competence.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design management; integrated design; sustainability management; sustainable building processes
Index terms: supervisor, sustainable building, meaning, environmental impact, sustainability management, building code, design decision, design management, construction project, competence, social interaction, designer, building performance
Subjects: environmental impact, sociology, profession, quality assurance, practitioner, production management, regulatory law, personnel development, design practice, environmental engineering, design process, sustainable construction
Topics: Legal Issues, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here