Overheating assessment for apartments during average and hot summers in the Nordic climate

Farahani, A V; kravchenko, I; Jokisalo, J; Korhonen, N; Jylhä, K and Kosonen, R (2024) Overheating assessment for apartments during average and hot summers in the Nordic climate. Building Research & Information, 52(3), pp. 273-291. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Amidst rising ambient temperatures and frequent heatwaves, assessing summer indoor overheating is crucial. This study examined overheating in over 6000 apartments to show the temporal aspects of indoor overheating during the hot summer of 2021 compared to the average summer of 2020 in the Helsinki region of Finland, with additional consideration of the apartments' design year, size, and number of rooms. Data analysis was conducted employing ANOVA and post hoc tests to assess the impact of apartment characteristics on overheating. Finnish building codes and health-related regulations defined three temperature thresholds to determine overheating: 27°C, 30°C, and 32°C. The findings indicated that during the summer of 2020, 76%, 8%, and 1% of apartments exceeded 27°C, 30°C, and 32°C, respectively. In the hot summer of 2021, these proportions increased significantly to 96%, 32%, and 4%. The average number of degree hours above 27°C in 2021 was three times higher than in 2020. While nighttime temperatures were slightly lower, there was a considerable number of degree hours above 27°C. Smaller apartments exhibited a higher risk of overheating. Those constructed after 2012 demonstrated lower overheating risks during the hot summer.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: apartment buildings; climate change; field study; heatwave; hot summer; Overheating risk
Index terms: regulation, climate change, building code, heatwave, data analysis, field study, ambient temperature, apartment building, overheating, summer, Helsinki, Finland
Subjects: regulatory law, political science, thermal systems, environmental engineering, Geography, research methods, data analysis and analytics, climate science, construction type
Topics: Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here