Foster, J A and Poston, A (2024) Occupant experience of domestic kitchen environments in low-energy social and affordable housing in Scotland. Building Research & Information, 52(7), pp. 799-816. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
New housing design has changed rapidly due to legislative requirements for energy-efficiency improvements. While housing energy efficiency is improving, little attention is given to individual indoor spaces, such as a domestic kitchen and associated occupant well-being. This study used secondary data from a building use survey (BUS) undertaken in 91 energy-efficient dwellings in five new social housing developments in Scotland to assess the occupant's views and experiences of their kitchen environments. The occupants' open-ended responses were explored using thematic analysis, identifying five themes: architectural design, building services, fixtures and fittings, change in diet and social outcomes. Satisfaction was reported for higher ceilings, good daylight, views and positive social engagement. Aspects considered poor related to construction quality, high internal temperature, low daylight levels, artificial lighting, and storage that negatively impacted the occupier’s lived experience. The results highlight broad issues associated with kitchen environments that can affect the occupiers' physical and mental health. While an exploratory study, the outcomes emphasize the need for focused research of a larger sample size to explore the impact of kitchens on the resident’s health and well-being in modern housing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance evaluation; domestic kitchen; health; indoor air quality; unintended consequences; ventilation; building use survey |
| Index terms: | health and wellbeing, ventilation, exploratory study, survey, unintended consequence, construction quality, housing, architectural design, indoor air quality, housing design, well-being, thematic analysis, sample size, secondary data, energy efficiency, building service, efficiency, satisfaction, social housing, building performance evaluation, mental health, affordable housing, Scotland |
| Subjects: | housing and residential development, health conditions and diseases, building performance, quality assurance, environmental health, design practice, performance management, research methods, Geography, methods and analysis, design process, sustainability and energy, project delivery, risk assessment, construction type, data collection methods, research design and methodology, mental health and wellbeing, air quality, engineering systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here