Gómez-Sirvent, J L; Fernández-Sotos, D; Fernández-Sotos, A; Sánchez-Reolid, R; López de la Rosa, F and Fernández-Caballero, A (2024) Exploring the impact of windows on musicians' experience: A neuroarchitecture perspective. Building Research & Information, 52(7), pp. 765-780. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Performing music can be an enjoyable activity or a source of anxiety and discomfort. Previous studies suggest that it is possible to create spaces that promote well-being by applying knowledge from neuroscience to architectural design. However, this application remains unexplored in the context of music practice spaces. In this study, a virtual replica of a real conservatoire classroom was used to investigate the effect of window size and views through windows on the perception of the built environment. A sample of 61 musicians was recruited, and through questionnaires and eye tracking, participants' responses to environmental changes while playing their instruments were studied. The results of the experiment indicated a clear preference for larger windows, which significantly contributed to a more positive environment, perceived as more open, light, inviting, calming and spacious. In addition, eye tracking data suggested a reduction in anxiety levels, as evidenced by reduced gaze velocity and saccade ratios. These results demonstrate that windows and related variables such as daylight and views can have a significant impact on the experience of musicians during solo performance. This highlights the need to re-evaluate design considerations in music practice spaces, emphasising the crucial role of environmental elements in enhancing musicians' well-being.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | eye tracking; immersive virtual environment; landscape; neuroarchitecture; performance anxiety; window size |
| Index terms: | immersive virtual environment, environmental change, built environment, discomfort, architectural design, preference, anxiety, questionnaire, well-being, classroom, window, experiment |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, decision-making and reasoning, infrastructure and transport systems, climate science, data collection methods, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, virtual reality |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here