Kanninen, V; Ryöppy, S; Lähtinen, K and Toppinen, A (2024) Actor perceptions and network characteristics around climate-wise housing and construction in Finland. Building Research & Information, 52(8), pp. 941-956. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Interaction between actors in sustainability transition is fundamental for generating knowledge about what constitutes a just, equitable and sustainable society. This paper focuses on the Finnish housing and construction sector as a socio-technical system, which currently accounts for about 40% of energy consumption and 35% of greenhouse gas emissions. A qualitative interview study with 18 organizations and a larger network study involving 35 actors were conducted to address the research questions: How do actors constitute a network and define climate-wise housing and construction? What specific focus areas can be identified around climate action? What issues support or inhibit climate-wise housing and construction? Although the network appeared relatively dense and inclusive, misalignment emerged upon closer examination. The actors were uniformly engaged in energy-related topics, but differed in their emphasis level on household choices, low-carbon materials, and the circular economy. Supporting and inhibiting factors were identified within three broad categories: alignment of goals, network characteristics, and transformation propensity. The findings suggest that climate action is gaining ground in housing and construction, but there is evidence of institutional inertia, a demand for accelerating support for intermediation, and a need to harness organizational resources and individual capabilities to create sustainability transitions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; climate action; energy efficiency; networks; sustainability transition; interview |
| Index terms: | Finland, circular economy, transformation, energy efficiency, interaction, energy consumption, household, interview, society, construction sector, misalignment, housing, greenhouse gas emission, socio-technical system, evidence |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, environmental health, communities and social development, industry analysis, demography, Geography, sustainable design, theoretical framing, energy systems, sustainability and energy, business, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, engineering problems, construction type |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here