Kishan, R; Jayakodi, S and Asmone, A S (2024) Causal relationships of human errors in building maintenance: Findings from Sri Lanka. Building Research & Information, 52(4), pp. 431-445. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Building maintenance is a pivotal determinant for ensuring uninterrupted and flawless operations for facilities. From the moment construction is completed until the demolition, maintenance activities must be diligently performed to establish a secure working environment. Building maintenance costs hold the considerable cost for an organization. Consequently, the effective execution of building maintenance procedures becomes imperative to reduce maintenance expenses and enhance workplace safety. Maintenance errors arise due to a range of factors, including human, management, building design, and machinery errors. Among these causative factors, human errors were more likely to occur. Accordingly, this study aims to identify the causal relationships of human errors in building maintenance. Mixed-method research approach was used with a survey strategy, where primary data was collected from a questionnaire survey and subsequent expert interviews. Data were analyzed under both qualitative and quantitative analytical approaches. 39 causes of human errors were identified through literature and among which, 13 most critical causes of human errors were identified. These critical causes were classified into four category groups, viz. information and communication, resource, management, and design, construction, and installation related. Critical human error probabilities were computed and used to develop a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to describe the causal relationships.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian belief network; building maintenance; causes of human errors; human errors; probability; sensitivity |
| Index terms: | building design, Sri Lanka, determinant, building maintenance, interview, workplace safety, survey, bayesian belief network, strategy, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | probabilistic model, occupational health, management, Geography, architectural design, construction type, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here