Automated filtering of façade defect images using a similarity method for enhanced inspection documentation

Liang, H; Weng, Y; Tang, S W Y and Yeoh, J K W (2024) Automated filtering of façade defect images using a similarity method for enhanced inspection documentation. Building Research & Information, 52(1-2), pp. 194-206. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are routinely utilized to capture images of building façades for structural health inspections. These images are often taken at regular time intervals, capturing overlapping views to ensure complete coverage of the façade. However, this practice generates numerous highly similar images, leading to inefficiencies in documentation and potentially biased analysis due to redundant data. Hence, this study proposes an automated image data filtering method based on defect similarity. Given façade images where defects are detected, this method applies key point detection and descriptor matching to measure image similarity concerning defect presence. Subsequently, a selection strategy is proposed to produce a minimal set of representative images covering all defects. This method was validated using a dataset of UAV-captured façade images across three façades, successfully deriving the set to six representative images. Overall, the proposed method offers a practical solution to reduce the quantity of images required for documentation, thereby enhancing the efficiency of UAV deployments for façade inspection.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Façade inspection; image filtering; representative image selection; unmanned aerial vehicles
Index terms: dataset, documentation, strategy, presence, unmanned aerial vehicle, efficiency, inspection
Subjects: environmental science, professional development, automation and robotics, performance management, management, quality assurance, data management
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here