Constructing a theory-informed workplace design framework: co-design case study for knowledge work environment satisfaction improvement

Markkanen, P and Herneoja, A (2024) Constructing a theory-informed workplace design framework: co-design case study for knowledge work environment satisfaction improvement. Building Research & Information, 52(8), pp. 870-886. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Addressing work environment design methods has become increasingly important due to pandemic-induced changes in the ways and locations of work. This research addresses work environment design through a theory-informed workplace design framework to study the co-design process, the impact of spatial atmosphere on workplace experience and satisfaction, and infrequently studied spaces, i.e. meeting rooms and breakout areas. This case study is based on co-design methods, a workplace design intervention study and its evaluation. Comprehensive design is addressed through analytical dimensions of design, i.e. instrumental, symbolic, aesthetic and perceived dimensions of atmosphere and affordances. Furthermore, the spatial experience is explored through need-supply fit theory and workplace satisfaction. The pre-design results showed that employees have distinct design preferences based on perceived and analytical dimensions for technical, hybrid and creative meetings and individual work and recovery events. The workspace interventions were designed using the design information gathered from the co-design process; the changes implemented in intervention spaces increased employee satisfaction towards them. The study’s methodology contributes to establishing a theory-informed workplace design framework supporting user-centred workplace design and evaluation and indicates a role for spatial atmosphere in need-supply fit formation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: co-design; combi-office; office design; work environment; workplace design; workplace satisfaction
Index terms: aesthetic, workspace, case study, satisfaction, recovery, pandemic, office design, design method, dimension, work environment, design process, preference, affordance, workplace design, methodology
Subjects: specialized design, behavioral psychology, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, factor and component analysis, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, management, operations management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, data collection methods, design methods
Topics: Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here