Outpatient oncology settings: the distinctive contribution of supportive design to patient experience and wellbeing

Sadek, A H; Willis, J; Joubert, L; Shah, B; Fawzy, M and Speakman, D (2024) Outpatient oncology settings: the distinctive contribution of supportive design to patient experience and wellbeing. Building Research & Information, 52(7), pp. 817-835. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The concept of patient-centred care is increasingly shaping healthcare practices, particularly within oncology settings. Its implications extend to a hospital's constructed environment and how it is designed, yet few studies have explored patient experience of such sensitive settings, and even fewer have examined outpatient oncology facilities. This study researched how the hospital built environment affects cancer patient wellbeing using in-depth interviews with 24 patients across Australia and Egypt. Analysis of patient-narrated experiences shed light on the potential latent impact of the built environment on patient health-related outcomes, such as pre-treatment anxiety and treatment-induced sensitivities and stresses. Three overarching themes were identified, including the built environment capacity to contribute to incidences of positivity; balancing the unavoidable (necessary) presence in the hospital; and encouraging reasons to return–potentially enhancing treatment compliance. The study further demonstrates how such support may contribute to experiencing a desired climate of patient-centred care, affording additional grounds for patients to cope with the potential burdens of treatment and its side effects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; emotional wellbeing; hospitals; outpatient oncology; patient experience; supportive design
Index terms: Australia, anxiety, built environment, interview, compliance, presence, well-being, Egypt
Subjects: environmental science, health safety and environment, infrastructure and transport systems, Geography, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods
Topics: Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here