Enhancing work commitment through workplace design: development and prioritization of evaluation criteria in South Korea

Shin, J and Lim, H (2024) Enhancing work commitment through workplace design: development and prioritization of evaluation criteria in South Korea. Building Research & Information, 52(8), pp. 887-904. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Workplace design elements influence work commitment; however, previous studies broadly categorized these elements, lacking specific practical design information. This study aims to classify workplace design elements that influence work commitment into structural and decorative elements, then further categorize them into top-level factors and sub-items. Using two surveys with employees, this study derived evaluation criteria, resulting in 6 factors and 19 sub-items for structural elements, and 6 factors and 27 sub-items for decorative elements. Subsequently, an additional survey was conducted with employees to prioritize the derived workplace design elements for work commitment. The results indicated that workplaces designed for work commitment should be as follows: first, structural elements should be prioritized over decorative elements. Second, structural elements should be considered in the order of outdoor space perception, scale, functionality, circulation impact, visual impact and aesthetic characteristics. Third, decorative elements should be considered in the order of furniture, colour, material, interior landscaping, personal lighting devices and graphics. This study establishes criteria for workplace design to enhance work commitment and provides valuable insights for improving work commitment through design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: criteria development; design elements; work commitment; workplace design; questionaire survey
Index terms: aesthetic, South Korea, functionality, commitment, survey, circulation, workplace design
Subjects: design features, psychology, data collection methods, design practice, factor and component analysis, urban design, Geography
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here