Climate declarations for buildings as a new policy instrument in Sweden: a multiple streams perspective

von Malmborg, F; Rohdin, P and Wihlborg, E (2024) Climate declarations for buildings as a new policy instrument in Sweden: a multiple streams perspective. Building Research & Information, 52(4), pp. 479-496. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Sweden has recently adopted new legislation on mandatory climate declarations of buildings. This occurred before the EU policy requests. The implementation of climate calculations and the visibility of the results of these calculations in a declaration is intended to increase building developers' knowledge of the climate impact from construction and improves the opportunities for the developer to make conscious choices that reduce their climate impact. Using the Multiple Stream Framework as a theoretical lens, we analyse by qualitative and quantitative text analysis, the formulation and decision-making on the new law. A majority of stakeholders approved the proposal for the new law, but it was not undisputed. Some stakeholders advocated a voluntary scheme instead of a mandatory scheme. Some key stakeholders advocated a focus on life cycle emissions rather than embedded construction emissions only. The final line of conflict was that the climate declarations are not linked to the most important phase for reducing the climate impact of buildings, which is planning and design, rather than construction. We show how frame disconnection and frame polarization was used by the Government Offices of Sweden and the Swedish government to downplay critique from key stakeholders.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; climate declaration; climate policy; eco-labelling; multiple streams framework; policy process
Index terms: critique, stream, legislation, policy process, implementation, climate policy, life cycle, policy instrument, decision-making, Sweden, text analysis, proposal
Subjects: policy studies, value management, decision analysis, project planning, climate policy, Geography, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, evaluation and assessment methods, legal systems, water management
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Procurement, Governance, Research Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here