Winkler, C; Perez Vico, E and Widén, K (2024) Challenges to business ecosystem alignment when implementing solar photovoltaic systems in the Swedish built environment. Building Research & Information, 52(5), pp. 497-514. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Implementing solar photovoltaic systems in the built environment (BEPV) is critical for the construction sector’s contribution to mitigating climate change. While previous studies give various insights into innovation implementation, the challenges to value co-creation by construction actors remain underexplored. By studying the alignment of business ecosystems implementing BEPV in the Swedish built environment, we address this need. Drawing on the cumulative experience of construction actors, this study demonstrates how knowledge mislocation, knowledge deficits, cultural discrepancies, insufficient building codes, frequently changing regulations, and implementing a highly embedded innovation can disturb ecosystem alignment. The study contributes to the ecosystem literature, scholarly discussions of innovation implementation in complex construction projects, and the PV diffusion literature by offering insights into the realignment of ecosystems involving value co-creation by actors from previously unconnected industries. The study links PV diffusion research to the construction management literature by exploring the cumulative experience of implementation at the micro level. We highlight the significant industry reconfigurations required to accommodate a deeply embedded technological innovation, reconfigurations going beyond the challenges of implementing systemic innovations encumbered by fewer material dependencies. We also emphasize the critical importance of industrial interaction, coordination, and learning to accelerate the sustainability transition.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business ecosystem; construction; innovation implementation; solar photovoltaic |
| Index terms: | drawing, construction sector, building code, climate change, value co-creation, construction project, reconfiguration, regulation, implementation, interaction, systemic innovation, coordination, photovoltaic, technological innovation, built environment |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, contractual arrangements, energy systems, innovation and technology management, organization, value management, climate science, political science, behavioral psychology, infrastructure and transport systems, regulatory law, industry analysis, management, production management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here