Yang, X; Zhong, H; Wang, Z; Du, P; Zhou, K; Zhou, H; Lai, X; Lau, Y L; Song, Y and Tang, L (2024) BEKG: A built environment knowledge graph. Building Research & Information, 52(1-2), pp. 19-37. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In recent years, the digitalization of the built environment has progressed rapidly due to the development of modern design and construction technologies. However, the need for extensive professional knowledge in this field has not been met by practitioners and scholars. To address this problem, a study was conducted to build a knowledge graph in the built environment domain, which stores entities and their connections in a graph data model. To achieve it, this research collected more than 80,000 paper abstracts from the built environment domain. To ensure the accuracy of entities and relationships in the knowledge graph, two well-annotated datasets were created with 29 types of relationships, each containing 2000 and 1450 instances, respectively, for Named Entity Recognition (NER) and relationship extraction (RE) tasks. Two BERT-based models were trained on these datasets and achieved over 85% accuracy in both tasks. Using these models, over 200,000 high-quality relationships and entities were extracted from abstract data. This comprehensive knowledge graph will help practitioners and scholars better understand the built environment domain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; knowledge graph; machine learning; natural language processing; scientific knowledge discovery |
| Index terms: | professional knowledge, design and construction, practitioner, built environment, accuracy, dataset, machine learning, digitalization, data model |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, professional development, practitioner, data science, artificial intelligence, digital technology, data management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Information Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here