Comparative analysis of mobile laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning for the indoor mapping

Yiğit, A Y; Gamze Hamal, S N; Ulvi, A and Yakar, M (2024) Comparative analysis of mobile laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning for the indoor mapping. Building Research & Information, 52(4), pp. 402-417. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Efficient three-dimension exploration of a complex indoor environment remains a difficult duration in mapping accuracy requirements for geometric data. Indoor and outdoor mapping, which has been done with classical measuring devices for a long time, has come a long way with the use of laser scanning technology in this field. Although terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point cloud recording provides great convenience in indoor and outdoor mapping, it is disadvantageous in terms of time and cost. Therefore, in our study, we propose a new indoor mapping strategy with wearable mobile laser scanning (WMLS) approach, which uses the simultaneous localization and mapping algorithm, which has been tried recently, as an alternative to TLS point cloud. In this strategy, four test areas with different geometric structures were scanned. A comparative analysis was performed after each test area was scanned with TLS and WMLS devices. For accuracy analysis, reference data were measured with a precision measuring device, and both scan data were compared on a spatial and length basis. The study results showed that the proposed strategy could be an alternative to TLS in terms of accuracy and the time advantage of the WMLS method.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: indoor mapping; lidar point clouds; SLAM; terrestrial lidar; wearable mobile lidar
Index terms: laser scanning, exploration, mapping, comparative analysis, accuracy, strategy, point cloud, localization, dimension, duration, indoor environment
Subjects: digital design, professional development, spatial and geospatial analysis, management, project controls, health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, environmental resource management, urban planning
Topics: Time Control, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Governance, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here