Architectural space classification considering topological and 3D visual spatial relations using machine learning techniques

Yıldız, B; Çağdaş, G and Zincir, I (2024) Architectural space classification considering topological and 3D visual spatial relations using machine learning techniques. Building Research & Information, 52(1-2), pp. 68-86. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The paper presents a novel method for classifying architectural spaces in terms of topological and visual relationships required by the functions of the spaces (where spaces such as bedrooms and bathrooms have less visual and physical relationships due to the privacy, while common spaces such as living rooms have higher visual relationship and physical accessibility) through machine learning (ML). The proposed model was applied to single and two-storey residential plans from the leading architects of the 20th century Among the five different ML models whose performances were evaluated comparatively, the best results were obtained with Cascade Forward Neural Networks (CFNN), and the average model success was calculated as 93%. The features affecting the classification models were examined based on SHAP values and revealed that width, control, 3D visibility and 3D natural daylight luminance were among the most influential. The results of five different ML models indicated that the use of topological and 3D visual relationship features in the automated classification of architectural space function can report very high levels of classification accuracy. The findings show that the classification model can be an important part of developing more efficient and adaptive floor plan design, building management and effective reuse strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural space classification; artificial intelligence; floor plan analysis; machine learning
Index terms: machine learning, bedroom, privacy, accuracy, neural network, strategy, building management, artificial intelligence, architect, accessibility
Subjects: artificial intelligence, profession, professional ethics, architectural elements, management, inclusive design, professional development
Topics: Roles and Professions, Information Management, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here