Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction

Stewart, R A and Mohamed, S (2001) Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction. Construction Innovation, 1(3), pp. 147-163. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Leading organizations do not stop at the gathering and analysis of performance data; rather, these organizations use performance measurement to stimulate improvement efforts and successfully translate strategy into action. In other words, they use performance measurement for managing their organizations. The most commonly used performance evaluation tool, the balanced scorecard (BSC) has been used extensively in the manufacturing, government, banking, retail, insurance and financial services sectors. This paper looks at potential applications and benefits of using the BSC as a framework to evaluate the performance improvement resulting from IT/IS implementation by a construction organization. The paper firstly seeks to adapt the original BSC concept to construction and then attempts to develop a performance measurement framework in the form of a tiered “Construct IT” BSC. The developed framework allows for the measurement of IT/IS performance at three different decision-making tiers (i.e., project, business unit and enterprise tiers). At each tier, a group of performance indicators are used to describe key aspects of activities that occur frequently enough to warrant meaningful measurement and comparison. The proposed framework applies the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) to facilitate aggregating the obtained diverse performance measurements, thus giving rise to an overall IT/IS performance improvement measure (score) at each decision-making tier. To illustrate the application of the proposed framework, a project tier example is provided.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytic hierarchy process; balanced scorecard; information systems; information technology; multi-attribute utility theory; organizational tiers; performance measurement
Index terms: performance indicator, strategy, banking, decision-making, information system, performance evaluation, information technology, performance measurement, balanced scorecard, construction organization, multi-attribute utility theory, insurance, performance improvement, implementation
Subjects: economic analysis, contractual arrangements, organization, computing systems, decision analysis, information systems, decision-making and optimization, performance management, performance measurement, management
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here