El. Reifi, M H and Emmitt, S (2013) Perceptions of lean design management. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9(3), pp. 195-208. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The importance of managing the early design phases effectively and efficiently is relatively well appreciated, although how best to do this is not so clear. The successful use of lean management in the construction phase, using the principles largely developed by Toyota, has opened up the possibility of using lean design management, thus helping to establish a systematic approach to the creative design phase. This study explores the interpretation and application of lean design management in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC). A survey questionnaire was used to obtain an understanding of current design management processes and practices in the UK. Findings from 125 responses indicate that inefficiencies are related to ineffective design management processes (e.g. management of briefing, design, etc.) as well as problems with procurement. The main conclusion drawn is that lean design management appears valid for implementation in the AEC sector, but needs to be customised according to the project context in order to achieve the desired value for all stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture, engineering and construction; client briefing; design process value stream; design process waste; lean design management |
| Index terms: | design process, design management process, survey, value stream, design management, design phase, questionnaire, implementation, construction phase, briefing |
| Subjects: | design methods, scope management, organization, business, data collection methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, professional practice, design process |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Value Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here