Developing a framework for a standardized works programme for building projects

Blyth, K; Lewis, J and Kaka, A (2004) Developing a framework for a standardized works programme for building projects. Construction Innovation, 4(4), pp. 193-210. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

This paper reports on the development of a framework for a standardized programme of works for construction projects. A sample of 50 buildings, encompassing a total of 11 different project functions, were surveyed and analysed. The sample was then investigated further to assess the existence of similarities and repeated operations in each individual construction project. A minimum of 20 standardized elemental options were identified. From analysis of the data and the application of practitioners' expertise, a logical sequence of activities, including their respective dependencies, was produced. A set of six new test projects was used to see if the initial methodology was sound. It could be concluded that despite each project being unique, most buildings retain cognate, elemental options that provide the basis for any structure, and these can be standardized and used as a basis for a universal programme of construction works. The standardization of activities would enable the automation of project planning processes and hence would result in reduced administration and management costs. This will encourage contractors and other project team members to undertake planning at earlier stages of the project, hence providing the basis for more accurate cash flow, duration and cost forecasts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: elemental design; programme of works; sequencing; standardization; stereotypes
Index terms: cash flow, programme, practitioner, construction project, methodology, project planning, stereotype, construction work, standardization, project team, option, automation, duration
Subjects: operations management, project delivery, control systems, practitioner, project controls, sociology, decision analysis, financial management, performance measurement, research methods, production management, automation and robotics
Topics: Time Control, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here