Construction safety management: An exploratory study from China

Cheng, E W L; li, H; Fang, D P and Xie, F (2004) Construction safety management: An exploratory study from China. Construction Innovation, 4(4), pp. 229-241. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

This paper aims at presenting the analysis of the views of construction participants in China's construction industry on three major site safety issues. First, data from three distinctive roles (project managers, safety officers, and foremen) on site safety knowledge were analysed. Results indicate that they have low levels of safety knowledge. This is consistent with the existing literature, implying that safety training and education is a major issue around the world. In addition, the views of project managers and safety officers are further elicited on the second issue (that is, factors affecting site safety) and the third issue (that is, methods for improving project safety management). Results indicate that both parties have quite consistent views. The six most important factors are “lack of attention to safety protection by workers”, “lack of attention to safety management by main contractors/project managers”, “insufficient safety training”, “inadequate safety level”, “tiredness of workers”, and “poor quality of construction materials and equipments”. The five most promising methods are “increase in safety investment in terms of manpower, capital and finance”, “improvement in safety operations”, “no alcohol at work”, “increase in safety training and education for workers”, and “increase in safety inspection”. Discussions are given in this paper.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; construction sites; developping countries; factors; safety
Index terms: alcohol, safety management, construction safety, China, exploratory study, safety issue, construction site, construction industry, safety training, construction material, safety inspection, low level, project manager, main contractor
Subjects: research methods, Geography, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, industry analysis, environmental health, quality assurance, profession, practitioner, psychology, work location, building materials
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Site Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here