A process-driven IT training model for construction: Core development issues

Goulding, J S and Alshawi, M (2004) A process-driven IT training model for construction: Core development issues. Construction Innovation, 4(4), pp. 243-254. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Information technology (IT) has often been cited as being able to create competitive advantage. However, the degree of leverage is often dependent upon several factors, not least the type and level of IT training provided, resources available, management commitment, and prevailing level of corporate culture. This paper introduces the generic processes involved in developing an IT training framework in order to support and deliver the business strategy, and presents findings in the form of a generic IT training model. This model identifies the sequential stages needed to commission and deploy IT training in a construction environment in the form of an implementation roadmap. This model was developped with two leading UK construction organizations. Findings have identified that seven core process phases should be considered before committing resources to training. Recommendations include identifying the core business benefits and matching these to the training outcomes, albeit cognisant of barriers such as lack of empowerment, organizational culture, resource limitations, and so on.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business strategy; information technology; performance; process modelling; training
Index terms: implementation, core busines, competitive advantage, construction organization, organizational culture, information technology, training model, corporate culture, business strategy, commitment, process modelling, empowerment
Subjects: psychology, design analysis, curriculum development, contractual arrangements, organization, business, computing systems, market analysis, sociology, management
Topics: Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Education, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here