Sarshar, M; Haigh, R and Amaratunga, D (2004) Improving project processes: Best practice case study. Construction Innovation, 4(2), pp. 69-82. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
This paper describes SPICE (Structure Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises), which is a process improvement framework for construction organizations. SPICE is a five level step by step maturity framework. It assesses an organization's performance against levels of process maturity, identifies their strengths and weaknesses and highlights their improvement priorities. SPICE was developed in close collaboration with the construction industry and tested on real projects. This allowed the framework to take into account practical industrial needs. This paper provides an outline of the SPICE framework. It focuses on a best practice case study of SPICE implementation on a partnering relationship between a major client and a major contractor. The paper details the SPICE assessment and fact finding process. Based on this assessment, it identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the partnering operation and provides specific guidelines for project improvement. Main strengths of the partnering included: (1) close physical proximity of client, design and project management teams; (2) top level commitment to improve productivity; and (3) adoption of manufacturing philosophies and methods in order to deliver improvements. Main weaknesses included: (1) lack of integration between systems and processes of the partnering organizations; (2) presence of cultural and incentive differences between the partnering organizations, which led to fragmentation of the project teams; and (3) little evidence of process evaluation and improvement efforts by the teams. Based on these, some recommendations are made for future improvements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capability maturity model; process improvement; process maturity; project management; spice |
| Index terms: | construction industry, implementation, project team, project management, best practice, presence, productivity, construction organization, partnering, case study, capability maturity model, collaboration, integration, evidence, project management team, fragmentation, commitment, philosophy, process improvement |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, management, philosophical studies, industry analysis, partnership management, organizational analysis, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, organization, business, environmental science, contractual arrangements, project delivery, psychology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here