Edwards, D J; Yang, J; Cabahug, R and Love, P E D (2005) Intelligence and maintenance proficiency: An examination of plant operators. Construction Innovation, 5(4), pp. 243-254. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The productivity and output levels of construction plant and equipment depends in part upon a plant operator’s maintenance proficiency; such that a higher degree of proficiency helps ensure that machinery is maintained in good operational order. In the absence of maintenance proficiency, the potential for machine breakdown (and hence lower productivity) is greater. Using data gathered from plant and equipment experts within the UK, plant operators' maintenance proficiency are modelled using a radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural network (ANN). Results indicate that the developed ANN model was able to classify proficiency at 89 per cent accuracy using 10 significant variables. These variables were: working nightshifts, new mechanical innovations, extreme weather conditions, planning skills, operator finger dexterity, years experience with a plant item, working with managers with less knowledge of plant/equipment, operator training by apprenticeship, working under pressure of time and duration of training period. It is proffered that these variables may be used as a basis for categorizing plant operators in terms of maintenance proficiency and, that their potential for influencing operator training programmes needs to be considered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | breakdown; maintenance proficiency; neural network; plant and equipment; plant management; plant operator; productivity; radial basis function |
| Index terms: | duration, plant and equipment, neural network, productivity, artificial neural network, programme, apprenticeship, construction plant, manager, accuracy, weather |
| Subjects: | professional development, modelling and simulation, management, air quality, artificial intelligence, professional education, manufacturing engineering, project controls, practitioner, construction equipment |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Information Management, Education, Plant and Equipment, Business Strategy, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here