Matsumoto, I; Stapleton, J; Glass, J and Thorpe, T (2005) Developing a framework to measure organizational and employee skills development in a professional engineering design consultancy. Construction Innovation, 5(1), pp. 53-66. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
As we move into a knowledge economy, employee skills are fast becoming an organization’s most valuable asset. Fundamental to successfully completing the complex range of tasks presented by construction projects is bringing together individuals with the correct balance of skills. No one individual has the complete set of skills to do everything themselves, which makes the team only as strong as its weakest link. Sponsored by a leading UKbased engineering design consultancy, a specification for a technologically driven skills management system was developed. It allowed the organization, its teams and the employees, to better measure, manage and develop their skill capabilities effectively. Key issues addressed by the paper include how skill ability can be measured, how skills can be structured, and how these measurements and structure can be combined to generate skills reports. The development of a prototype application, based on the above mentioned specification, tested the validity of the specification, and demonstrated to the sponsor the benefits that can be achieved by a systematic and practical approach to capturing, reviewing, planning and managing employee skills. It also highlighted the important business rationale for using such systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | employee skills; intellectual assets; organizational management; professional development; skill measurement |
| Index terms: | prototype, organizational management, skills development, management system, specification, consultancy, construction project, validity, professional development, becoming, engineering design |
| Subjects: | philosophical process, contractual condition, production management, design process, personnel development, professional development, management, modelling and simulation, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, business |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here