Packham, G; Miller, C J; Thomas, B C and Brooksbank, D (2005) An examination of the management challenges faced by growing SCEs in South Wales. Construction Innovation, 5(1), pp. 13-25. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Entrepreneurship and small business development has been subject to a considerable amount of academic speculation. Previous studies contend that small fast growth firms are more likely to have developed or acquired managerial practices in areas such as human resource management, finance and marketing. Despite this evidence there is little known as to why growing construction firms adopt key management practices. This paper examines how small growth oriented construction firms have adopted management practices to sustain growth. A group interview technique was utilized to examine the management development process within small construction firms in the South Wales area. The research revealed that while management practices such as marketing, financial management and planning had been implemented to facilitate growth, the importance of these practices often varied across firms. Nevertheless, firms that continued to be growth oriented were more inclined to consider the strategic benefits that certain practices provide. Based on these findings the paper concludes that management training initiatives aimed at improving firm development in the construction industry must be tailored to fit the strategic goals of the firm if they are to engender sustainable growth.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | growth; management practices; sces |
| Index terms: | evidence, management practice, small business, Wales, interview, construction firm, human resource management, marketing, entrepreneurship, construction industry, financial management, small construction firm |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, business, economic analysis, Geography, management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here