Dulaimi, M; Khalfan, M M A and McDermott, P (2006) Innovating for supply chain integration within construction. Construction Innovation, 6(3), pp. 143-157. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The dream of better relationships among different supply chain partners; trust and transparency during different construction activities; integrated supply chain; completion of projects on time, within the agreed cost, with promised quality products and services, and so on, have now been achieved within the UK construction industry due to innovation within the project procurement processes and activities. There has also been a growing realisation that the promotion of innovative thinking, in procurement processes for supply chain integration, offers all the involved parties some key benefits in terms of more flexibility and adaptability, commercial growth, and improved quality of products, and delivered service. This paper highlights the benefits of, and the motivation towards innovative procurement through two case studies done as part of a supply chain integration project at the SCRI research centre. The case studies demonstrate how organizations involved have promoted innovative thinking across the supply chain through innovative procurement. The case studies also highlight some of the critical factors that motivated people within those firms to move from traditional way of procurement, and search, innovate, and implement the new procurement thoughts and models. The paper concludes that these studies offer transferable learning opportunities and motivation for the staff of other construction firms seeking to promote integration within their supply chains through innovative procurement routes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | innovation; motivation; procurement; supply chain integration |
| Index terms: | critical factor, construction activity, case study, promotion, research centre, supply chain integration, transparency, construction industry, construction firm, motivation, procurement process, project procurement, adaptability, integration |
| Subjects: | management, professional development, organizational analysis, industry analysis, user focus, organization, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, psychology, contractual arrangements, construction operations, supply chain integration |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Procurement, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here