Strategy: The motivation for innovation

Dulaimi, M; Stewart, I and Fenn, P (2006) Strategy: The motivation for innovation. Construction Innovation, 6(3), pp. 173-185. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

This paper proposes that strategy activity is the most necessary form of and foundation for innovation. It is also the real context for any innovation effort that is intended to create competitive advantage, especially in response to three key strategic issues construction industry; changing client demands for value, partnering, and supply integration. Innovation is the profitable exploitation of ideas. Clearly, this requires two things a source of ideas that can lend themselves to profitable exploitation and a goal in pursuit which to exploit the ideas. Those goals are established and met by strategic innovation. The right strategy tools can motivate ideas and insight. However, elements of normal industry practice constitute strong demotivators to profitable strategic innovation, hence the presence of strategy activities noted in the industry. This paper discusses the development of the strategic management discourse and to identify tools for use in construction industry innovation that relate to its strategic challenges; the Value Chain, Game Theory and Delphi Technique. The paper also identifies the process of “Bricolage”, potentially a fourth tool, or process, which could be a source hard to imitate advantage in developing strategic innovation practices which act catalyst for participation and the means to profitably exploit new ideas. With strategicallyoriented innovation, a firm can identify and create new value for its customers and integrate its supply chains. Without it, innovation is at best blind, at worst, will never happen; there no goal to exploit the idea in pursuit of. Without strategy, there is no motivation to innovate.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bricolage; client value; creativity; innovation; strategy; supply chain
Index terms: motivation, game theory, strategy, Delphi technique, strategic management, integration, exploitation, creativity, client value, competitive advantage, value chain, partnering, construction industry, presence
Subjects: environmental science, decision models, psychology, data collection methods, client relations, industry analysis, innovation and creative processes, partnership management, organizational analysis, market analysis, value chain strategy, management
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here