Grisham, T and Walker, D H T (2006) Nurturing a knowledge environment for international construction organizations through communities of practice. Construction Innovation, 6(4), pp. 217-231. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore and test conceptual issues of how communities of practice (CoPs) are a recognized means of transferring knowledge. Analysis of data, derived from reflection upon experience gained by close fulltime engagement on three complex, largescale engineering construction projects. Five emerging themes that help to explain how CoPs may be nurtured to increase the effectiveness of project management are revealed: creating a knowledge environment, discovering and recruiting potential members, information sharing, time for communicating, and motivation and rewards. The development of CoPs requires time and the creation of a knowledge environment. In the complex world of international construction, most projects are unique physical undertakings, have teams that have never worked together before, have a limited duration, with participants located in numerous countries. Thus, there is a natural tension between the need and the reality that requires strong crosscultural leadership, and special techniques, if CoPs are to be utilized. This paper practically illustrates, based on rigorous organizational literature theory largely missing from the engineering community, how CoPs can be actually nurtured and used. The metaphor used to illustrate this should resonate strongly with construction engineers and designers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communities; knowledge management; project management |
| Index terms: | duration, motivation, engineer, knowledge management, designer, international construction, construction project, reflection, communities of practice, information sharing, project management, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | performance management, strategic management, project controls, production management, data exchange, professional development, profession, knowledge management, project management theory and practice, psychology |
| Topics: | Information Management, Time Control, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Human Resources, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here