al Nageim, H; Nagar, R and Lisboa, P J G (2007) Comparison of neural network and binary logistic regression methods in conceptual design of tall steel buildings. Construction Innovation, 7(3), pp. 240-253. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – To investigate the feasibility of using artificial neural networks for conceptual design of bracings systems for tall steel buildings. Design/methodology/approach – Database of 234 design examples has been developed using commercially available detailed design software. These examples represent building up to 20 storeys. Feed forward back-propagation neural network is trained on these examples. The results obtained from the artificial neural network are evaluated by re-substitution, hold-out and ten-fold cross-validation techniques. Findings – Results indicate that artificial neural network would give a performance of 97.91 percent (ten-fold cross-validation). The performance of this system is benchmarked by developing a binary logistic regression model from the same data. Performance of the two models has been compared using McNemar's test and receiver operation characteristics curves. Artificial neural network shows a better performance. The difference is found to be statically significant. Research limitations/implications – The developed model is applicable only to steel building up to 20 storeys. The feasibility of using artificial neural networks for conceptual design of bracings systems for tall steel buildings more than 20 storeys has not been investigated. Practical implications – Implementation of the broad methodology outlined for the use of neural networks can be accomplished by conducting short training courses. This will provide personnel with flexibility in addressing buildings-specifics bracing conditions and limitations. Originality/value – In tall building design a lot of progress has been made in the development of software tools for numerical intensive tasks of analysis, design and optimization, however, professional software tools are not available to help the designer to choose an optimum building configuration at the conceptual design stage. The presented research provides a methodology to investigate the feasibility of using artificial neural networks for conceptual design of bracings systems for tall buildings. It is found that this approach for the selection of bracings in tall buildings is a better and cost effective option compared with database generated on the basis of expert opinion. It also correctly classifies and recommends the type of trussed bracing system.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | binary logic; buildings; neural nets; regression analysis; steel |
| Index terms: | option, regression analysis, implementation, propagation, designer, database, logistic regression, neural net, feed forward, conceptual design, validation, configuration, methodology, artificial neural network, neural network, tall building, personnel |
| Subjects: | data management, decision analysis, statistical analysis, systems engineering, management, design practice, research methods, professional development, modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence, construction type, profession, engineering process, control systems |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here