Al Nageim, H and Pountney, D (2007) A non-linear optimisation technique based on the complex method: The optimal design of a concrete trough supporting a new lightweight rail track system, lr55. Construction Innovation, 7(4), pp. 320-339. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The aim is to present findings of a theoretical analysis for optimal design of a concrete trough for a new lightweight low-profile rail track system. Design/methodology/approach – A non-linear numerical optimisation technique is adopted to predict the minimum area of a pre-tensioned pre-stressed trough section satisfying the serviceability and ultimate limit states as per British Standard BS 8110 for critical loading and boundary conditions. Findings – An optimum concrete trough section is calculated to carry all possible load combinations expected during the design life of the track. The performance of the rail, elastomeric pad and track base were found to be satisfactory under the same critical loading and boundary conditions. Originality/value – The theoretical analysis gives a valuable insight into system parameter values that can optimise design performance and cost. However, these optimal design features now need to be tested experimentally.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concretes; optimization techniques; rails |
| Index terms: | methodology, linear optimization, boundary condition, optimization technique, loading |
| Subjects: | research methods, algorithms, structural engineering, construction operations |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here