Supply chain transactional barriers to design cost management

Ross, A and Goulding, J (2007) Supply chain transactional barriers to design cost management. Construction Innovation, 7(3), pp. 274-287. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the factors that can influence the availability of cost information to support design and production decision making at the early stages of project team formation. Design/methodology/approach – An investigation of the current practice of the exchange of financial information between supply chain organisations in the UK construction industry that was undertaken using a portal survey with 710 estimators. The survey sought data on the extent and maturity of the relationships that existed between contractors and their supply chain, and the effect this had on the gathering of subcontract price information. Findings – The data analysis established that a significant difference existed in the approaches adopted by respondent organisations to the collection of subcontract price data for three different procurement approaches, and that main contracting organisations were developing closer relationships with their supply chain. Practical implications – The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of supply chain price information for pre-contract negotiation and post-contract governance can influence the propensity of the supply chain to provide “richer” information on the costs assumptions made within their estimates to improve the empirical basis for future decision making. Originality/value – The paper takes an original approach to the construction estimating process by considering supply chain price information available to the estimator.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change management; construction industry; financial information; procurement; supply chain management; United Kingdom
Index terms: investigation, construction industry, estimate, project team, cost information, design cost, contract negotiation, contract governance, decision-making, methodology, construction estimating, estimator, contracting organization, data analysis, subcontract, United Kingdom, change management, survey
Subjects: contract type, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, financial and cost management, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, corporate governance, accounting and finance, economics, research methods, management, contract management, Geography, decision analysis, industry analysis
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Contract Administration, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here