Tatari, O; Castro-Lacouture, D and Skibniewski, M J (2007) Current state of construction enterprise information systems: Survey research. Construction Innovation, 7(4), pp. 310-319. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The paper's purpose is to describe and examine the level of utilisation of construction enterprise information systems (CEIS) and to identify critical success factors and benefits from their implementation. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted to quantify the current situation of CEIS. The population consisted of stakeholders with reliable working knowledge of their firms' information systems. Statistical tests were conducted to draw conclusions from the data. Findings – A total of 48 per cent of the firms use enterprise resource planning packages, but only 4 per cent of these firms chose to implement the project management modules that are commercially available. Only 16 per cent of the respondents were satisfied with their current level of integration due to CEIS. There was no evidence to suggest a tendency for the integration level due to CEIS to increase together with the business geographical dispersion. Research limitations/implications – The rate of response to the survey was low (9 per cent), maybe due to the unavailability of CEIS in all the firms that were contacted. Further, research is needed to study the dynamics between management practices and their effect on CEIS adoption and level of integration. Practical implications – Integration efforts and software that are currently in use still do not fully address the concerns of industry practitioners. Associations found between the level of integration and project characteristics can be used to help IT stakeholders decide on the CEIS functions to adopt. Originality/value – The strategic, operational and organizational benefits found from the implementation of CEIS are based on current data obtained from a targeted survey of construction related firms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; construction systems; information systems; project management; resource planning |
| Index terms: | survey, evidence, practitioner, population, integration, management practice, methodology, construction system, statistical test, critical success factor, information system, package, enterprise resource planning, module, dynamics, project management, implementation, resource planning, construction industry |
| Subjects: | resource management, contractual arrangements, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, control systems, building construction, demography, organizational analysis, statistical analysis, systems engineering, information systems, industry analysis, computer science, research methods, architectural elements, management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Site Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here