Senaratne, S and Udawatta, N (2013) Managing intragroup conflicts in construction project teams: Case studies in Sri Lanka. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9(3), pp. 158-175. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Conflict is intrinsic to individuals, teams and organisations. Due to the unique and complex nature with various parties, conflict is inevitable in most construction projects. According to the general management literature, three distinct types of intragroup conflicts can be identified: task, process and relationship conflicts. However, very little consideration has been given in the literature addressing the three types individually in a construction project team setting. Therefore, this study has explored the existence of types of intragroup conflicts and their management in this context. This research was approached through case studies of six construction projects, which were operating under the traditional procurement method in Sri Lanka. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three distinct participants from each team. The findings revealed that both process and relationship conflicts offer disruptive effects to construction projects and teams, while task conflicts offer positive effects when they exist at low levels. Based on the most critical sources identified within the cases, suggestions are offered here to construction project team managers on how to manage intergroup conflicts proactively. Since the research is based on six case studies on traditional procurement arrangement in Sri Lanka, further research is required to generalise the findings across different contexts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict management; construction projects; intragroup conflicts; project teams |
| Index terms: | interview, construction project team, conflict management, relationship conflict, project team, Sri Lanka, case study, manager, low level, traditional procurement, construction project |
| Subjects: | project delivery, measurement and scaling, data collection methods, practitioner, production management, Geography, conflict resolution, management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Project Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here