Blismas, N and Wakefield, R (2009) Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation, 9(1), pp. 72-83. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – Much has been written on offsite manufacture (OSM) in construction, particularly regarding the perceived benefits and barriers to implementation. However, very little understanding of the state of OSM in the Australian construction industry exists. A “scoping study” was recently conducted to determine the “state-of-the-art” of OSM in Australia. The purpose of this paper is to report on the overall findings of the study. Design/methodology/approach – The study took a broad qualitative survey-based approach. This involved three industry workshops, several interviews and seven case studies across four major states of Australia. The study surveyed a range of suppliers across the construction supply-chain, incorporating the civil, commercial and housing segments of the market. Findings – The study revealed that skills shortages and lack of adequate OSM knowledge are generally the greatest issues facing OSM in Australia. OSM uptake into the future is dependent on many factors, not least of which is a better understanding of the construction process and its associated costs. Unlike the USA and UK, the Australian construction industry faces unique challenges in how it transforms construction into a modern and efficient industry. Originality/value – This is the first work undertaken to determine the benefits and barriers to OSM in the Australian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; construction industry; construction operations |
| Index terms: | case study, workshop, construction operation, Australia, construction industry, implementation, interview, face, survey, methodology, construction process, state of the art, shortages, housing |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, building construction, Geography, research methods, construction operations, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, psychology, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, construction type |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Procurement, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here