Davidson, C H (2009) The challenge of organizational design for manufactured construction. Construction Innovation, 9(1), pp. 42-57. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address an aspect of the innovation process leading to manufactured construction, which is often ignored, namely the organizational changes that necessarily accompany major innovations such as manufactured construction, calling for systemic organizational design. Design/methodology/approach – The information for the case histories was obtained over a number of years by embedded research, where the researcher played an essential role in the projects described, thus allowing access to unpublished information. This observation-based information was compared to other cases reported in the literature or about which knowledge was obtained though other means, enabling analytical generalizations to be drawn. Findings – Results confirm the initial expectations. In a context of minimum state intervention, e.g. through mechanisms of market aggregation (in UK and the USA for example), namely where the internal forces of the building sector act upon each participant (including manufactured construction innovators), the design of an appropriate organization with its accompanying novel relationships is essential. Originality/value – This paper makes it possible to show that contemporary manufactured construction innovators should recognize the importance of up front organizational design as a co-requisite for technical design. This phase is often overlooked, exposing the innovator to unnecessary risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; organizational design; procurement; stakeholder analysis; supply chain management; systems analysis |
| Index terms: | organizational change, systems analysis, stakeholder analysis, embedded research, methodology, history, organizational design |
| Subjects: | business, analytical methods, architectural and construction history, participation process, research methods |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here