Wilkinson, P; Glockling, J; Bouchlaghem, D and Ruikar, K (2013) Using business impact analyses to enhance resilient fire engineering building design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9(4), pp. 229-249. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
As an engineering discipline within the United Kingdom, fire engineering is relatively young. It has been accepted as an alternative to traditional prescriptive means of meeting the functional requirements of the building regulations since the publication of the 1985 edition of Approved Document B. Performance-based fire engineering design methods have facilitated architectural design freedoms and supported creative construction. However, it has become evident that since fire engineering has become more established, significant concerns have been raised regarding various elements of the design process including the ability to consider aspects other than life safety. In response to these concerns, this article introduces novel application of concepts to assist the building design team to consider their client's resilience requirements. This is by utilising business continuity planning methods, specifically business impact analyses within the fire engineering qualitative design review. By using these concepts in this new way, the architectural design team will be able to identify those processes which are of greatest importance to their client's organisation, allowing the most appropriate fire engineering strategy to be established.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business impact analysis; fire engineering; resilient building design |
| Index terms: | strategy, United Kingdom, design process, planning method, building design, building regulation, publication, architectural design, fire engineering, impact analysis, performance-based, design method, business continuity |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, design methods, urban planning, data analysis and analytics, architectural design, design practice, management, performance measurement, safety engineering, Geography, project risk, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Governance, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here