A perception-influence model for the management of technology implementation in construction

Miller, A; Radcliffe, D and Isokangas, E (2009) A perception-influence model for the management of technology implementation in construction. Construction Innovation, 9(2), pp. 168-183. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a model based on participant perceptions and the resulting influences on the outcome of a technology implementation in construction projects. This paper outlines the conception and development of the model. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative methodology combines implementation theory with the empirical data to conceive the model. Data are collected by an immersed researcher employing a participant-observation technique. Findings – This perception-influence (P-I) model suggests that negative perceptions of value, benefit and usability cause innovation implementations to be ineffective with an end result of discontinued use or neglect. The model maps an innovation implementation through using participant perceptions as the primary model constructs. In the model, each perception is formed by a number of contributing factors and has only a positive or negative associated action. Practical implications – The P-I model is a planning and evaluation tool that is useful for technology managers at any stage of an innovation implementation. Originality/value – The paper puts forward a new perspective for implementation research in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; innovation; perceptions; project management
Index terms: project management, evaluation tool, implementation, construction industry, usability, maps, manager, management of technology, construction project, methodology
Subjects: contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management, evaluation and assessment methods, user-centered design, practitioner, industry analysis, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, production management, project management theory and practice
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here