Sabharwal, A; Syal, M and Hastak, M (2009) Impact of manufactured housing component assembly redesign on facility layout and production process. Construction Innovation, 9(1), pp. 58-71. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the impact of the component assemblies redesign on the material handling costs associated with the facility layout and also, on the productivity of the assembly process. Component assemblies are the sub-assemblies that are incorporated into the manufactured house as it progresses on the assembly line. Design/methodology/approach – Floor assembly is used as an example to demonstrate the impact of the component assembly redesign process. A step-by-step process of assembling a floor in the case study factory is described and changes to the process are proposed. The existing and redesigned floor assemblies are analyzed using the factory layout analysis models and the production simulation models. Findings – The proposed redesign resulted in a small savings of less than 1 per cent in the material handling costs and a substantial savings of around 20 per cent in the production time. Research limitations/implications – The work described in this paper is based on the existing floor assembly process in a case study factory. Due to the practical limitations, material handling routes and production activities associated with the redesigned assemblies were estimated. The results from this research show that redesign of component assemblies can provide potential avenues of savings for the manufactured housing industry. Such analysis can be performed for any component assembly individually or in combination with other assemblies in order to realize potential savings with relatively minor changes. Originality/value – Production-related research in manufactured housing has traditionally focused on either improving the facility layout or the assembly line process but not the combined impact of these two aspects. This paper presents a possible approach to investigating the combined impact by analyzing the impact of redesigned floor assembly.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction system parts; design for assembly; facilities; materials management; prefabricated buildings; United States of America |
| Index terms: | productivity, savings, United States of America, case study, prefabricated building, redesign, assembly line, production process, material handling, construction system, housing, materials management, methodology |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction type, design methods, operations management, economic analysis, product delivery, research methods, management, manufacturing engineering, Geography, building construction |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Site Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here