Thorpe, D; Ryan, N and Charles, M B (2009) Innovation and small residential builders: An Australian study. Construction Innovation, 9(2), pp. 184-200. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – Through investigating the innovation-adoption process in smaller construction industry firms, this paper aims to ascertain the drivers of innovation in Australian small residential building firms, and determine how such firms develop or adopt innovations. The research thus provides a more thoroughly nuanced understanding of the innovation-adoption process within these firms. Design/methodology/approach – The research described in this paper was conducted among small residential housing contractors in South-East Queensland, Australia. This was undertaken by means of a semi-structured interview process, based on a questionnaire requesting information from owners or managers. Findings – Innovation in this sector is driven by general business concerns pertaining to maintaining overall competitiveness rather than specific client needs. The same firms also utilize supply-chain relationships and broader industry associations as sources of external knowledge. Despite this, better pathways to transfer externally generated knowledge require implementation, especially as a means to ensure continued sector growth and deliver public goods such as enhanced worker health and environmental sustainability. Practical implications – The paper highlights the current communication and informational disjuncture between research institutions and practitioners. As a result, workable suggestions for enhanced and meaningful interaction among firms, peak bodies and key research institutions are advanced. Originality/value – The study complements previous research on innovation development and adoption. Given that there is little previous research on the innovation-adoption process in the residential building sector, the paper provides an important counterpoint to studies that generally focus on much larger construction firms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; construction industry; innovation; small to medium-sized enterprises |
| Index terms: | owner, Australia, research institution, residential building, construction industry, implementation, interaction, public good, competitiveness, construction firm, residential housing, Queensland, builder, manager, interview, innovation development, environmental sustainability, methodology, practitioner, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, behavioral psychology, market analysis, research management, sociology, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, innovation studies, practitioner, data collection methods, construction type, organization |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here