Value management awareness and practice by South African architects: An empirical study

Bowen, P; Jay, I; Cattell, K and Edwards, P (2010) Value management awareness and practice by South African architects: An empirical study. Construction Innovation, 10(2), pp. 203-222. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate value management (VM) practice by professional architects in South Africa. A primary aim is to test the assertion of Kelly et al. that VM has “evolved to become an established service with commonly understood tools, techniques and styles.” Design/methodology/approach – A webbased, online questionnaire survey was employed to establish VM practice by South African registered architects. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the survey response data. Findings – The results suggest that awareness of VM is not widespread among South African architects, and that its actual practice is minimal. Where VM was used on projects, it was invariably costminimization driven in terms of both the project and the VM process itself. These findings are in direct conflict with the assertion of Kelly et al. There is also a mismatch between clients' value system key performance variables and objectives defined for VM studies. Use of VM for project brief facilitation is not widespread, and the integration of VM with risk and quality management systems is not pervasive. Where VM was undertaken, no attempt is made to benchmark VM activities against international standards. Practical implications – Professional architectural associations in South Africa should adopt a proactive role in promoting the use of VM by architects; facilitated by continuing professional development programmes. Originality/value – The originality of the research lies in determining the nature of, and extent to which, architects in South Africa practice VM.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; South Africa; value analysis
Index terms: minimization, value analysis, programme, survey, methodology, integration, questionnaire, South Africa, continuing professional development, quality management system, empirical study, value management, architect, mismatch, statistics
Subjects: organizational analysis, project controls, financial analysis, research methods, algorithms, management, professional development, Geography, project delivery, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, profession, engineering problems
Topics: Organizational Design, Education, Time Control, Digital Applications, Value Management, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here