Doloi, H (2010) Benchmarking a new design management system using process simulation approach. Construction Innovation, 10(1), pp. 42-59. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to put forward a researchbased argument on the benefits of simulation approach in managing design at an early stage of a project. Having selected an optimal design configuration, the operational uncertainties can be removed and investment decisions are fully justified over the lifecycle of projects. Design/methodology/approach – A simulationbased methodology embodying balanced scorecard (BSC) for measuring the operational and business performance has been synthesised in the research. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been employed to evaluate the tradeoffs between feasible design alternatives and to select the optimum design configuration. Findings – The findings show that the integrated framework developed in this research by integrating simulation technology, BSC and MCDA adds significant contributions in improving the current body of knowledge in the design management practices. Research limitations/implications – The framework should further be tested by applying to large engineering projects in order for realising the benefits in the decisionappraisal process. Access to data in large projects before implementation would be the greatest challenge from a commercialinconfidence perspective. Practical implications – The framework will help the practitioner's understanding and management of the design configuration in highly complex modern projects. This will allow the decision makers to manage interdependency of complex processes and select optimal designs upfront. The resulting framework will significantly contribute to reducing scope creeps and cost variations and thereby reducing contractual disputes in projects. Originality/value – The original design of the integrated framework of this kind for managing design complexity in projects adds significant value in the design management practices. The use of simulation embodying BSC and MCDA adds significant novelty in theoretical advancement of contemporary knowledge in the design management profession.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | balanced scorecard; benchmarking; construction industry; design and development; project management; simulation |
| Index terms: | process simulation, body of knowledge, appraisal, complexity, benchmarking, design management, variation, methodology, practitioner, configuration, business performance, decision analysis, dispute, balanced scorecard, design and development, implementation, construction industry, investment decision, project management, profession, scope creep, lifecycle |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, practitioner, institututions, scope management, project delivery, economic analysis, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, research methods, management, performance measurement, factor and component analysis, design process, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, decision analysis, systems engineering, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Contract Administration, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here