Nadim, W and Goulding, J S (2010) Offsite production in the UK: The way forward? A UK construction industry perspective. Construction Innovation, 10(2), pp. 181-202. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on findings from the first stage of an ongoing research with regard to the UK construction industry's perception of offsite production (OSP) adoption/uptake, in an attempt to inform the second stage of the research (not reported in this paper) to infer the skills/knowledge areas needed for the wider uptake of OSP. Design/methodology/approach – The objective of this paper was to capture the UK construction industry's perception visàvis OSP characteristics using a quantitative approach. Postal surveys were employed to collect industry perception which was then analysed statistically for inference and conclusion. Findings – Findings from 36 large construction organisations suggest that irrespective of respondents' organisations prime activity or professions, the majority of respondents perceive OSP to be the future of the UK construction industry; with a considerable belief that the industry is ready to embrace OSP. Nevertheless, the industry do not seem to fully appreciate OSP, which is implied by the uncertainty recorded in most of the responses. Research limitations/implications – Whilst the data validity and sample set coherence can be considered robust and defendable, it should be acknowledged that care needs to be taken when interpreting results, especially as the data collected depended heavily on the survey approach. Furthermore, these findings are limited to the UK context only, as such, the level of generalisability/repeatability outside this context may not be representative of the findings presented here. Originality/value – OSP falls under the overarching umbrella of modern methods of construction, which is high on the UK Government Agenda. OSP has attracted numerous research over the last decades; however, there is limited literature to quantify industry perception in this regard, especially to enable the inference and prioritisation of skills and knowledge areas needed to support the wider uptake of OSP (not reported in this paper).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; construction operations; education; skills; training; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | falls, validity, construction operation, modern methods of construction, large construction organization, construction industry, profession, survey, United Kingdom, coherence, methodology |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, building construction, Geography, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, construction operations, economic analysis, institututions, human factors and perception, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here