Bassanino, M; Fernando, T and Wu, K C (2014) Can virtual workspaces enhance team communication and collaboration in design review meetings? Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(3-4), pp. 200-217. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The development of software to facilitate collaborative working among project teams has been an active research area for the last two decades. However, the recent impetus in deploying Building Information Models (BIMs) in construction has brought teamwork to the forefront and, therefore, it is important to conduct an in-depth study as to how BIM could be complemented with advances in visualisation and interaction technology to enhance team communication and collaboration. Effective tools that bring critical data and stakeholders together to solve design challenges have the potential to produce optimised solutions, reduce the number of meetings, improve communication and, consequently, delivery times. This paper explores how virtual workspaces supported with advanced visualisation and interaction techniques can enhance team communication and collaboration. It explores the type of communication channels necessary for supporting team collaboration with the use of both public and private workspaces that are essential for supporting individual and team exploration. These features are then implemented and tested using a collaborative design scenario. This research shows that the implementation of direct and indirect communication channels within virtual workspaces can significantly enhance team communication and collaboration. Furthermore, it shows that the use of a private workspace can assist individuals to contribute creatively to team activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 3D tools; co-located environment; collaboration; communication |
| Index terms: | teamwork, team collaboration, workspace, exploration, delivery time, collaboration, project team, interaction, implementation, visualization, collaborative design |
| Subjects: | time analysis, behavioral psychology, collaborative management, design practice, management, contractual arrangements, project delivery, environmental resource management, design methods |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Procurement, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here