A fuzzy competence requirement (FCR) model for competitive bidding strategy

Tan, Y and Shen, L (2010) A fuzzy competence requirement (FCR) model for competitive bidding strategy. Construction Innovation, 10(1), pp. 75-88. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose – The “multicriteria selection” has become popular practice in selecting contractors, especially for public works, which involve multiple stakeholders. In line with this development, contractors need to consider more factors apart from offering a lower bidding price in formulating a bidding strategy. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a quantitative method, namely the fuzzy competence requirement (FCR) model, for assisting a contractor to formulate a better bidding strategy by better utilising its competence for meeting the best multiple criteria imposed by clients. Design/methodology/approach – The fuzzy linear programming with multiple objectives technique is applied in this paper and an illustrative example is introduced to demonstrate the application of the proposed model. Findings – The FCR model can assist in generating a range of bidding strategies by assuming different confidence levels that contractors may perceive. These strategies could be valuable references for contractors to develop their competitive bidding strategy, which enables contractors to efficiently utilise their competence to meet clients' multiple selection criteria. Research limitations/implications – The FCR model can provide contractors with useful information for formulating their bidding strategy. However, other factors, such as the sense of the market and estimation of rivals' bidding strategy, should also be considered in the bidding decision. Practical implications – The FCR model can help contractors make better decisions in bidding by considering their competence and meeting client's multiple criteria. Originality/value – This paper introduces a new model – FCR model – for helping contractors improve the efficiency of their bidding decision.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; contracts; fuzzy logic
Index terms: fuzzy logic, efficiency, estimation, linear programming, public work, construction industry, selection criteria, competitive bidding, strategy, quantitative method, competence, methodology, bidding
Subjects: infrastructure engineering, personnel development, algorithms, research methods, tendering, performance management, management, industry analysis, financial and cost management, data science, bidding, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Human Resources, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here